We are now in Wikicommons adding structured data for pictures. Lesson learned from some test in WIkidata and depict of part of a picture I feel we need an extra layer for depicts. I see what you depict in a picture is dependent on what story you would like to tell.... i.e.
- depict people in a painting
- depict details in a painting
- depict differences between 2 objects
I was part of a OCLC subsidary and then we created a SGML solution and using the HyTime standard for "annotate" SGML dependent on who was accessing it......
For me this is the next step of "Things not strings" that you also depict details in a picture....
Question: Do you agree this is of interest and should we have a WikiDepict layer that is depicting objects in Wikicommons (also video)....
==> more depicts layers can describe what is in one picture...
Some small test finding pictures that depicts people with P3217 ==> I feel this will be very interesting for GLAM
Misc
- Wikipedia's 5 million articles still cover less than 5 per cent of all human knowledge
- ISWC keynote Jamie Taylor Google
- tweet: OCLC session by @btwashburn setting up your own #Wikidata https://goo.gl/TUExvm
- About sources and wikidata
- LIIBRIS frågor/svar
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar